Friday, February 29, 2008

February 2008 Newsletter

A History of Hus Memorial Presbyterian Church, part 4
Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
Adapted from a Historical Treatise Written by Charlotte Stelcik

Early Beginnings In Linn County
In 1860 there were about 6,000 people in Cedar Rapids when Czech immigration began. By the middle of the 1860’s there was a goodly number of Czech Protestants in Cedar Rapids. The first beginnings of religious worship were difficult for the Czechs because many of them severed their relations with the Catholic Church. These people were led by atheists who made the word Christian despised by the Czech people. Fanatic atheists roamed among the Czechs in Cedar Rapids preaching mostly concerning the denial of Christianity and claimed that the expedient plan would go back to Greek culture. For this reason the Cedar Rapids Czech community came to be called Czech Athens. Among the first immigrants there were very few Protestants. Many became atheists because they were afraid to stand for the faith of their Hussite forefathers. They were known as the Evangelicals of the Reformed church. These people did not at first publicly espouse their religion but by holding meetings in their homes, they met and strengthened one another. Because of their poverty, it was years before they were able to afford a building in which to hold their religious services; therefore they met in homes to sing hymns to the accompaniment of a violin.

Occasionally these Protestants walked to Ely, nine miles from Cedar Rapids, to hear sermons by the Reverend Francis Kun, the minister of the Reformed Church in that rural community. This church, which had been organized in 1858, was the first Czech Protestant church in the United States.

Since the long trek to Ely was difficult for these people, they began to think of a place of their own for meeting. This couldn’t be realized, though, because in 1869, F. B. Zdrubek, with his newspaper, “Pokrok,” which means advancement, attacked the religious people, the word of God, and led the Czech people to the desecration of the Lord’s Day in a disgraceful manner. It became a day for picnics, drinking, parties, which became so disgraceful that in many cases public officials had to take action. Only after this man left Cedar Rapids did the American people begin to notice the small group of Christians among the Czech and their efforts to establish a church.

In 1868 Miss E. J. Lund, a public school teacher, reported to her pastor, Reverend James Knox of the First Presbyterian Church, that only a few of her pupils attended any form of religious services. As a result a Sunday School for theses Czech children was organized in July of that year and conducted in a small house on the corner of Seventh Avenue and Fifth Street near the Adams school. It was later held in two rooms of the Second Ward School. The whole congregation gladly accepted the friendly hand that was extended to them by Rev. Knox and some other of the English-speaking ministers in Cedar Rapids who took interest in the Czech people and served them. Our brethren began to meet in the old, empty building of the First Presbyterian Church. There they continued to hold services until the old church was torn down. To this old church Rev. Kun walked from Ely and preached three or four times a year.

After 1870, because the children lived too far away from the old First Presbyterian Church, attendance at the Sunday School decreased rapidly. Then in the year 1874, the Czech Evangelical people found a good friend in T. M. Sinclair, the owner of a packing plant where many of these people were employed. Sinclair was a devoted Christian and philanthropist. He gave the group fatherly care and because there was no better place, he made it possible for the group to meet in the factory in a shop where boxes were made. Here the congregation used boxes as seats and continued services for two years. Sinclair encouraged Czech Protestants to persevere in their efforts and invited workers to services; furthermore, in 1877 he built the Hope Mission Chapel (Third Presbyterian Church) on the hill in back of Saint Wenceslaus Church. Here at three o’clock Sunday School classes were taught in the English language, and at four o’clock church services were conducted in Czech. Rev. Kun cam occasionally to preach and with the support of Sinclair, the little group increased and prospered.

During that same year, Rev. J. E. Szalatnay, superintendent of the Reformed churches in Bohemia, visited the Cedar Rapids congregation. Mr. Sinclair tried to persuade him to remain as the local pastor and even guaranteed him a salary, but Rev. Szalatnay found it impossible to comply with this urgent request. Because it was impossible for him to remain in Cedar Rapids, he searched for a preacher in Europe, mainly in Edinborough, where Czech theologians studied, but he met with no success.

Two years later, on September 12th, with the aid of Mr. Sinclair, this little group of Protestants formally organized a Czech Reformed Church with Frank Nemecek, Jan Dudycha, and Karl Hromatka as their first elders. Services continued in the Hope Mission Chapel, conducted either by visiting ministers or by elders. Finally a Russian, Rev. Bonekempr, who offered to preach to the Czech congregation, came to the city at the expense of Mr. Sinclair. Since Rev. Bonekempr’s knowledge of the Czech language was poor, it was only with difficulty that the members of the congregation were able to understand him. Because of that difficulty his work was not successful. He preached his last sermon July 2, 1882. In the meantime Mr. Sinclair’s sudden death on March 24, 1881 brought sorrow to the congregation who he had so ably assisted.

After Rev. Bonekempr’s brief pastorate, the church was often aided by Rev. Edward R. Burkhalter, the minister of the First Presbyterian Church. From 1883 to 1890 Rev. Kun again preached in the Hope Mission Chapel once a month. When he came, services were well attended. Other people who conducted services during that time were Rev. Schauffler of Oberlin College; John Rundus, John Musil, and F. T. Bastel, theological students at Oberlin; and Frank Rundus from Park College in Missouri.

Because of Him ~ Terry

I urge you to pray for absolutely everything, ranging from small to large. Include everything as you embrace this God-life, and you'll get God's everything. And when you assume the posture of prayer, remember that it's not all asking. If you have anything against someone, forgive—only then will your heavenly Father be inclined to also wipe your slate clean of sins." Mark 11:24-25 (MSG)

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

... a li'l bit of scripture just to get you through the day

I just found A Li'l Bit. The following is from their website:

A Li'l Bit was created by some youth workers that are all about authenticity and truth. These guys wanted to provide a weekly podcast where kids could simply hear God's word presented in a real and relevant way. Nothing crazy, nothing too hard to understand... just pure truth shared in 10 minute "easy to understand" segments.

We chose iTunes as our vehicle for communicating this truth because we see more kids carrying iPods with them than Bibles. So we figured that this would be a good way to get the truth into the ears of a generation of young people who are going to make an impact in this world.

For more information about who these youth workers are, click here for information about TheSourceForYouthMinistry.com.

I pray you find this helpful in your walk with Christ.

Because of Him ~ Terry

Sunday, February 24, 2008

Claiming the Promised Land

Introduction
God said to Moses, “I have come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring them up out of that land to a good and broad land, a land flowing with milk and honey, to the place of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Amorites, the Per'izzites, the Hivites, and the Jeb'usites” (May & Metzger, 1977, pp. 69-70). God promised the Israelites a land of their own. How they got there was an ordeal in itself, how they get the land is another. “Real land, unlike theologically promised land, is always contested, disputed, and conflictual” (Birch, Brueggemann, Fretheim, & Petersen, 1999, p. 180). Was the land of milk and honey taken by conquest, infiltration, revolt, or a combination of the three?

The Conquest
Moses has died and it is now time for Joshua to take the Israelites into the Promised Land. The people that were occupying this land had no idea that the Israelites were about to cross the border and begin to take this land that God had promised to them. If a country is being invaded by foreigners they are, with some exceptions, going to resist. That resistance which ultimately leads to war makes the fact that “this model (conquest) takes the biblical texts at face value” (Grand Canyon University [GCU], 2007, p. 2) make sense. The hypothesis “that the “conquest” of the land of Canaan by Israel under Joshua was a wholesale military onslaught, whereby Israel invaded the land as an effective occupying force and seized much of the land for Israel” (Birch et al., 1999, p. 181) was dominant in the first part of the twentieth century. There have been archeological discoveries that support this hypothesis, including excavations by W. F. Albright. “Albright's own excavations in the 1920s and 1930s at Beitin and Tell Beit Mirsim (which he believed to be the sites of biblical Bethel and Debir respectively) unearthed destruction levels which he associated with the traditions of the conquest” (Bimson, 1989, p. 1). This method has come under historical scrutiny especially since Albright, who had initially held to the date of conquest around 1400 B.C., “faltered and finally moved to a later date for the conquest (c. 1250 B.C.)” (Brantley, 1994, pp. 1-2).

Infiltration
After the destruction of Jericho and Ai, the Gibeonites tricked the Israelites into making a treaty with them. When the Israelites realized what had happened they were upset with their leaders. “The leaders said to all the congregation, "We have sworn to them by the LORD, the God of Israel, and now we may not touch them. This we will do to them, and let them live, lest wrath be upon us, because of the oath which we swore to them" (May & Metzger, p. 274). The Gibeonites were spared and lived among the Israelites.

Joshua 13 alludes to the fact that not all of the land was conquered when the Israelites first crossed the Jordan. “Now Joshua was old and advanced in years; and the LORD said to him, "You are old and advanced in years, and there remains yet very much land to be possessed” (May & Metzger, p. 278). Verses 2 through 6 further define the land that they have yet to possess. In addition to this “there are records of areas of the hill country, such as the region around Shechem, which Israel is portrayed as occupying in the book of Joshua (8:30-35; 24:1, 32), but for which there is no account of conquest. This may attest to a peaceful settlement in such an area. Advocates of the peaceful infiltration hypothesis have recently emphasized the continuous presence of nomadic groups living in symbiotic relationship with the settled inhabitants throughout the Fertile Crescent. These groups could easily move into the hill country of Palestine and occupy it during the period in question” (Hess, 1993, p. 495). It would have been easy for the Israelites to meet up with these nomadic groups and come make covenants with one another including aiding one another in battle. The German scholars Albrecht Alt and Martin Noth “concluded that the Israelite settlement of Canaan was due to a gradual immigration into the land, not a military offensive. Alt and Noth further theorized that the Israelites must have been pastoral nomads who slowly filtered into the settled land from the desert, seeking pastures for their sheep” (Brantley, 1994, p. 2).

Revolt

One theory “suggests that there was no major invasion of Canaan from an outside force but simply the immigration of a small group of people who inspired a revolt of the Canaanite peasants” (Ellis, 1991, p. 2). Yet a look back at history shows many people who were oppressed by their rulers and they revolted against them in an effort to have a better life. This would support a theory that the Israelites were able to join together with those in that were on the fringe of society and easiest to befriend. The story in Joshua 2 “about a prostitute named Rahab who harbors Hebrew spies in her home in the city wall” is a good “example of how marginal, fragile people joined with the incoming Egyptian refugees to create a new society” (GCU, 2007, p. 2). This method “helps to understand why some cities fell to Israel without any reported military attack” (Catholic Internet Mission [CIM], n.d., p. 1). The trouble with this method is that there is little to be found in the scriptures to support it.


Challenges
The Israelites would face challenges once they had entered the Promised Land. Joshua had the task of dividing the land between the tribes that had crossed the Jordan. There were nine and one-half tribes to distribute land to. This is because “Moses had given an inheritance to the two and one-half tribes beyond the Jordan; but to the Levites he gave no inheritance among them” (May & Metzger, 1977, p. 280). Joshua and the leaders also had to help the people keep the covenant with God or risk losing what they had been given. “Obedience to Yahweh’s Torah makes land reception and maintenance possible” (Birch et al., 1999, p. 203).

Conclusion
Outside of the biblical texts it is difficult to pinpoint exactly how the Israelites came to possess the land of milk and honey. Just like the covenants that God made that promised this land to the descendents of Abraham it takes faith. We have to believe. “Jesus said to him, "Have you believed because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe" (May & Metzger, p. 1317). The blessings that the Israelites received were given because they believed.
Was the land of milk and honey taken by conquest, infiltration, revolt, or a combination of the three? Scholars will continue to try and prove or disprove each of these methods on how the Israelites claimed the Promised Land. They will continue to make archeological discoveries that may prove or disprove a particular theory. It is important that we hold to the truths that God has given us and doing that requires us to hold to the biblical account how the Israelites came to claim the Promised Land. Yet, how the Israelites came to claim the land may not be as important as the fact that God kept his covenant with them.

References
Bimson, J. J. (1989, October). The Origins of Israel in Canaan: An Examination of Recent Theories. Retrieved November 25, 2007, from http://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/article_canaan_bimson.html
Catholic Internet Mission (n.d.). "The Promised Land" - Three Theories of Israel's Conquest of Canaan. Retrieved November 25, 2007, from http://www.pcentral-online.net/scripture/canaan-conquest.html
Ellis, B. R. (1991). "Entry for 'CONQUEST OF CANAAN'". "Holman Bible Dictionary". Retrieved November 25, 2007, from http://www.studylight.org/dic/hbd/view.cgi?number=T1386
Grand Canyon University (2007). BIB 113 Lecture Four, Covenant Life and Canaan.
Hess, R. S. (1993). Early Israel in Canaan, A Survey of Recent Evidence and Interpretations. Palestinian Exploration Quarterly, 125, 492-518. Retrieved November 25, 2007, from http://individual.utoronto.ca/mfkolarcik/jesuit/richardhess.htm
May, H. G., & Metzger, B. M. (1977). The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha Expanded Edition and Revised Standard Version. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.

Friday, February 08, 2008

2008 Hus Racing League season starts Feb. 9th!

The 2008
Hus Racing
League season
starts Feb. 9th!

Spend quality time with family, friends, and neighbors racing Hot Wheels, Matchbox, & Johnny Lightning (and other 1/64 scale) cars on the 2nd Saturday of each month from February to November. It is a fun, exciting, and intense event that all will enjoy. Registration at 9:30 AM. Races at 10 AM. So come, enjoy the food, enjoy the excitement, enjoy the rush and just HAVE FUN!

2008 Race Schedule
February 9th
March 8th
April 12th
May 10th
June 14th
July 12th
August 9th
September 13th
October 11th
November 8th

For rules and class descriptions go to http://www.huschurch.org/,
click on the Hus Racing League link or go to
www.orangetrackracing.org.

For more information contact:
Hus Presbyterian Church
2808 Schaeffer Dr. SW
Cedar Rapids, IA
319-363-0067
888-622-0665
youthandfamily@huschurch.org


This site/event is not affiliated with Mattel Inc. or Learning Curve Brands, Inc. The names Hot Wheels and Matchbox are trademarks of Mattel Inc. The name Johnny Lightning is a trademark of Learning Curve Brands, Inc.

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

All activities for Wednesday, February 6, 2008 have been canceled.

Due to the weather, all activities for Wednesday, February 6, 2008 have been canceled.
  • No Ash Wednesday Service
  • No Evening Meal
  • No Youth Group
  • No Choir (Choir will meet Sunday morning at 9 AM for practice)
  • No Worship Team (The Worship Team will meet Sunday morning at 8:15 AM for practice)

The Hus Presbyterian Church office is also closed.

Because of Him ~ Terry

Tuesday, February 05, 2008

Youth Group for February 6, 2008

Hi All,

Youth group for Wednesday, February 6th is changing time and place. We will be meeting at
Christ Church Presbyterian for the Ash Wednesday service. Christ Church Presbyterian is located at 2000 1st Ave. NW in Cedar Rapids (click on the address for a map). Please call (319.363.0067) or email (youthandfamily@huschurch.org) me with questions. See you there!

Because of Him ~ Terry

Friday, February 01, 2008

Way to go Pepsi

This is one of the ads that Pepsi is going to be running during Super Bowl XLII. If you don't want to spoil it by seeing it early, don't click play. For more about Pepsico EnAble and the Bob's House ads go to http://www.pepsi.com/bobshouse/. There you can also click to read Pepsico's press release about the ad.

Because of Him ~ Terry